|
I generally try to steer clear of topics such as these but I really wanted to share my opinion on this one. I do not know this breeder at all (I have exchanged a couple of e-mails and one phone call with him in the past about a litter he was having and to talk Rotts, and that was all) and I have no reason to attack and/or defend him. That being said, ONLY LOOKING AT THE ONE SCENARIO IN THIS THREAD, I really can't see what he has done wrong at all as a breeder. Yes, there are probably dozens of breeders out there who may have felt sympathetic to Dirkster's situation, but we all know there are hundreds of ethical breeders who would just say "I'm sorry to hear of your situation, but please see my contract where it says DEPOSITS ARE NON-REFUNDABLE".
I myself have tried getting a deposit back from a breeder in the past, unsuccessfully. I was 24 years old, living paycheck to paycheck with VERY little "extra money" in the bank to fall back on. Did I think that breeder was a "scumbag"? At the time, yes I did. Looking back on it, was it their fault? No, it was my own for taking a risk on sending a deposit before I was 100% certain on that litter and ultimately selecting another one. I wrote that breeder explaining my situation and how that $500 would mean the world to me just to help with the costs of my future puppy’s food, crate, collar, etc etc, since I wasn’t a wealthy person and really “needed” it. I realize this situation was different from the one being discussed, but Brandon was given money that he may have spent or invested into his dogs under the understanding that this money was now his and would never need to be refunded.
From what Dirkster has written here, as someone who barely even knows Brandon, I'm quite sure the $1,000 he has given him will absolutely be credited to Dirkster for a puppy from vom Hause Bright whenever he is ready for one. I would also bet, based on what I've heard from others, that said puppy will be well-bred and well taken care of, which, when it comes down to it, should really be all we ask of a GOOD (but maybe not "exceptionally ethical") breeder.
I believe it's always up to both involved parties to read through the contract they're signing and know that regardless of what may happen in their personal lives, they must be prepared to adhere to it. What if everyone who sent deposits to this breeder tried telling him they were going bankrupt and they “needed” their money back? Should he just believe them all or feel bad for everyone because of their claim? Please don’t think I am accusing you of lying Dirk, because I do believe you, but there are just so many reasons someone could want or “need” money back that I can understand why the vast majority of breeders (both ethical and unethical) throw that “DEPOSIT IS NON-REFUNDABLE” clause into their contracts so the headache of needing to decide what to do in these situations doesn’t need to happen. Consider what you might say if Brandon sold you a puppy, unexpectedly went bankrupt and lost everything he owned, then contacted you pleading that you please understand and give him that puppy back because he knew someone who would be interested in buying him and he needed to resell him for the money? Plain and simple, that would be a breach of contract and though he went bankrupt, would you honestly send him that puppy back so he could get $1,000-$2,000? MAYBE you would, but you would expect everyone out there to do the same? Though I may not seem it, I am extremely sympathetic to your situation, Dirkster; I just honestly feel that this particular breeder is now just being attacked when he is really not doing anything wrong. I will not comment on other accusations that have been thrown at this breeder, because maybe they were legitimate and maybe they weren’t. I am just looking at the topic at hand. I know this guy has a passion for Rottweilers, shows his dogs, places importance on working titles, pays close attention to the health, beauty, and working traits of different pedigrees, and has close ties with reputable breeders abroad. Again I am not even trying to defend him in such a way that I'm telling anyone to go out and buy a puppy from him. If he (or anyone else) screws you for not adhering to a contract then by alllll means I would urge anyone to alert the Rottweiler community of it, but I truly do not believe this particular case deserves to be up here causing people to attack this breeder for adhering to the terms of his contract. Not that I'm expecting/asking anyone to care, it's really not the original post I'm bothered by so much as he is just someone who is upset posting about questionable ethics; I think that information should just be taken in by individuals so they can personally contemplate if they want to do business with that person; but is it really necessary for all the extras to come on here and start bashing them? Maybe I'm alone in thinking that is absurd and childish.
_________________ Dave Martin
Owner of: V-rated Kingston Martin vom Bullenfeld (son of Valentino vom Hause Neubrand X Zilly vom Bullenfeld - born 2/28/2009) http://www.working-dog.eu/dogs-details/ ... Bullenfeld
|